Introduction

The historic Dean's bungalow at KEM Hospital, a relic of the pre-independence era, has become the center of a heated controversy. The Municipal Corporation's decision to demolish this architectural gem has sparked widespread protests, with many arguing for its preservation.

Historical Significance

The Dean's bungalow, which dates back to the British colonial period, is not just a building but a symbol of the country's rich history. Its architecture reflects the era's design and serves as a physical reminder of the past. Despite its historical value, the structure is under the care of the Municipal Corporation, which has now opted for demolition rather than restoration.

Political Response

Former Ubatha corporator Sachin Padwal has taken a firm stand against the demolition. In a letter to Municipal Commissioner and Administrator Bhushan Gagrani, Padwal emphasized the need to conserve the Dean's bungalow. He argued that with the centenary celebrations of KEM Hospital approaching next year, demolishing such a significant part of its history would send a negative message to the public.

Protest and Demand for Preservation

Padwal's letter expresses strong disapproval of what he describes as the administration's arbitrary and tyrannical actions. He has called for the preservation of the Dean's bungalow, warning that failure to do so could lead to a mass movement. The letter highlights the potential for public unrest and the involvement of senior leaders from the Ubhata party if the Municipal Corporation proceeds with the demolition.

Conclusion

As the centenary year of KEM Hospital nears, the fate of the Dean's bungalow remains uncertain. The controversy has brought to light the broader issue of preserving historical structures in a rapidly modernizing city. The outcome of this dispute will not only affect the bungalow but also set a precedent for how historical heritage is treated in the future.